With technology evolving rapidly and process efficiency now sitting high on the agenda for most businesses, the hiring landscape across fintech is changing fast. Yet amid the rise of AI-driven recruitment tools, automation, and data-led decision making, one factor continues to matter more than most: human chemistry. Sadie Sirlin reflects on why the strongest sales hires and overall hiring outcomes still come down to understanding people, and why cultural fit, leadership alignment, and interpersonal dynamics remain critical in building successful fintech teams.
In a market increasingly shaped by speed, automation, and AI, the best hiring decisions still come down to people.
I keep coming back to that in conversations with founders, CROs, talent leaders, and the candidates I work with every day. Technology has obviously changed how we source, screen, and reach out, and those gains are real. But it still can’t tell you how someone will actually operate once they’re inside a team. In sales hiring especially, chemistry quietly decides whether a placement holds.
The Hires That Fail Rarely Fail on Skills
Across the US fintech market, I’ve watched senior sales hires fail for the same handful of reasons. It’s almost never because the person couldn’t sell. They had the logos, the numbers, the right pattern recognition.
What goes wrong is usually quieter:
- The communication style is misaligned with the leadership team.
- The pace doesn’t match. The candidate needs more structure than the business has, or the business needs more urgency than the candidate brings.
- Manager dynamics fall short. The founder wanted a partner; the hire wanted a brief.
- The team chemistry is simply off.
None of that shows up on a resume, and a keyword filter won’t catch it. In sales hiring, where the new hire is often expected to build a team and represent the company externally, those misalignments compound fast. The recruiters who get this right aren’t just reading CVs. They’re reading people.
What AI Can and Cannot Do
AI has a real role in the process. It screens resumes faster, supports outreach at scale, and frees recruiters up to focus on higher-value work. We use it to streamline admin. But it can’t tell you who’s going to thrive inside a specific business, under a specific leadership team, at a specific stage of growth.
Fit comes from understanding how a candidate operates, what environments bring out their best, and where the friction is likely to land. That comes from years of conversations, follow-ups, and honest feedback on both sides, not from a database.
Relationships Before Roles
The conversations I value most are often the ones that don’t lead to a placement, at least not immediately. That sounds counterintuitive in a fast market, but those are the ones that pay off later. You end up with a network of senior fintech operators you actually understand, and the strongest placements usually start long before a role officially opens. It’s the way I’ve always preferred to work, and it’s the rhythm of how our team operates at EC1.
What Candidates Are Really Looking For
The best candidates in fintech today are evaluating companies just as critically as companies evaluate them. They’re not asking “what is the role?” They’re asking what the team is actually like, how leadership makes decisions, whether the pace is ambitious or chaotic, and whether they’ll genuinely be trusted to do their job. For senior commercial leaders especially, who can pick their next move, they’re choosing a leadership team and a market thesis to back, not just a job. Helping them weigh that properly is where a good recruiter adds the most value.
Why This Matters More in US Fintech Right Now
Firms are hiring more selectively, so every hire carries more weight. For sales hires the cost of getting it wrong is rarely just the salary. It’s the lost quarters, the stalled deal cycles, the team that has to be rebuilt, and the customer relationships someone else has to re-warm. Chemistry isn’t a soft extra in that calculation. It’s one of the clearest predictors of whether the hire will last.
Final Thought
The best hiring decisions I’ve seen and been a part of still come down to something pretty simple, even if it’s hard to do well. One person reading another well enough to know whether they’ll actually fit. Technology can speed the process up, and it should, but it doesn’t replace the judgment underneath. The firms that consistently deliver the strongest outcomes aren’t the fastest. They’re the ones who know their market well enough to read the room properly. That’s the question I find worth thinking about most, because great hiring isn’t about who can do the job. It’s about who’ll thrive once they’re in it.
Contact Our US Team
If your business is currently hiring, scaling a team, or thinking more strategically about long-term go-to-market growth, our US team would love to connect.
Whether you are actively building your team today or simply looking to gain a clearer perspective on the wider fintech talent market, please get in touch. We are always open to sharing insight, market intelligence, and practical hiring guidance.
US Team
Director, Americas (Fintech Leadership)
Senior Manager (Sales Lead Specialist)
Technology & Engineering Practice Lead
Senior Manager (Sales Specialist)
Consultant (Technology)


